One more question.

If I am not doing any oc'ing at all, I haven't before and don't want to screw up my system cause i'm a n00b overclocker, what is better, the 6000+ or the e6300?One more question.
mathematics my friend6300-6000 = 300 the 6300 is better (¿?)One more question.
[QUOTE=''wklzip'']mathematics my friend6300-6000 = 300 the 6300 is better (¿?)[/QUOTE]Dude I know math, I was in calculus as a Sophomore in high school last year. Duh. And I was talking about the C2D E6300 vs. the 6000+ x2
[QUOTE=''wklzip'']mathematics my friend6300-6000 = 300 the 6300 is better (¿?)[/QUOTE]

:lol: n00baSSarueezz r3XX :P 6000 is better if you don't OC.
6000+ is even equivalent to 6600.
[QUOTE=''moo111''][QUOTE=''wklzip'']mathematics my friend6300-6000 = 300 the 6300 is better (¿?)[/QUOTE]Dude I know math, I was in calculus as a Sophomore in high school last year. Duh. And I was talking about the C2D E6300 vs. the 6000+ x2 [/QUOTE]thats why i said:according to the theory: core 2 duo = x2 c2d 6300 1.86.ghz > x2 6000+ 3.0ghz1.86> 3.0 ghzalso ''intel > amd'' because intel has more letters (?????)
if you are not OCing Stock AMD beats Stock Intelhere's proofhttp://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=130115
[QUOTE=''wklzip''][QUOTE=''moo111''][QUOTE=''wklzip'']mathematics my friend6300-6000 = 300 the 6300 is better (¿?)[/QUOTE]Dude I know math, I was in calculus as a Sophomore in high school last year. Duh. And I was talking about the C2D E6300 vs. the 6000+ x2 [/QUOTE]thats why i said:according to the theory: core 2 duo = x2 c2d 6300 1.86.ghz > x2 6000+ 3.0ghz1.86> 3.0 ghzalso ''intel > amd'' because intel has more letters (?????)[/QUOTE]

Wow you know nothing... most C2D at stock get killed by the 6000+
I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic.

cosmetics online